I agree. But we also need to look at the methods by which companies such as MASTERCARD, GOOGLE, AT&T have advanced their policy-claims within American and other federal court systems throughout the world. In 2009, facebook had changed its format and at the end of 2012, Google went through the Santa Barbara county system in order to establish new informational policies, which it would have contractually with its users and registrants.
Well there are separate types of information-stewardship that each of these companies have, but generally there is information sharing towards the build up of credit scores, psychological profiles, and on the individuals' own end her resume. As the ability to document stages of your life became a matter of convenience, corporations felt obligated as a matter of due course to publish for its own records these types of documents, due to their profit potential. So now we understand that we are more likely to be advertised for insurance after obtaining a mortgage or finalizing a matrimony. That is a small example of how information might be shared amongst communications, social media, debt-instrument organisations. And there is a host of hidden players that seek to obtain this information for their own purposes, either to exploit or discredit existing corporations or else to access into the accounts of the client-users. But also, there are nations that attempt to legitimize this type of assault/theft/blackmail through direct means, or by attempts to legitimize their work in the law.
Therefore, when there are concerted efforts to influence public opinion, order placed upon those who operate and regulate these informational programs, it happens through a level of sophistication that may deceive the populace. The WALL STREET JOURNAL runs the same article with two different headlines, in two different neighbourhoods. This is all the tip of the iceberg, but essentially, there have certainly been acts of libel and fraud occurring, on an individual level, in the format suited for informational digestion. And I think that in general people's coping mechanisms and socialisation patterns are insufficient to help them either assess how it may affect them (first subconsciously, then behaviourally to the potential of robbing of real decision), or how they may efface the false stories and obtain actual discernment.
But hello what is the impact? It is cognitive dissonance, which may lead to inaction. Then there are compulsions that may set in. The inability to socialise properly due to anxiety that is going unaddressed; finally the simple matter of allowing the sedentary lifestyle and not enough outdoors time would eventually devastate the environment.
Within a worldstage wherein the majority of developed nations operate public corporate-share exchanges, we would also question the reasons why international trade pacts are shunned, inconsistencies within the marketplace are found, and person with job experience as job restructurers rather than foremen and makers are able to influence policy. Why have we allowed investors to stock-profit off of government subsidies to the ford corporation, for instance?
The idea of nationalism is certainly complicated by the fact that Goldman Sachs is less of a financial-services investment firm to investors and more of a public debt-holding company. Mostly governmental debt on local and state levels. You can see that certain actions that have already transpired in recent months suggests that USA Government is going through a period of debt restructuring. If we allow such bankruptcy negotiations to take place behind closed doors, without the sincere acknowledgement of what is happening, it would lead to a worst type of slavery than the plantations. The basis would be information, foreknowledge of the petty crimes that individuals have committed, the credit score monitor program, programmes for the institutionalisation of "normal family" (in America as in China), and the myriad types of algorithms that control informations systems, which may lead to behavioural compliance. Such a society would preach that the individual has more freedoms than before, while assaulting/affecting certain motivations (intentionally or not), and then through financial oversight, explain what the individual may or may not do, given the circumstances.
I can understand if you read that and disagree, that it would not amount to slavery. But then you must acknowledge the parental duty of teacher and see how vulnerable urban populations may become. It is said that a sizable majority of americans do not have enough savings to pay their bills for the next 3 months. Meanwhile dutiful professionals who defend the public such as Eliot Spitzer and Eric Scheiderman walk a tight rope trying to rescue individuals from debt-traps which lead to the slavery I have described.
It would be very strange, to see on the surface this "nationalism" but then to know how any professed allegience that the individual might have is being tried, tested, and potentially manipulated to suit the purpose of the corporation that the person is involved through. We would have to clarify, certainly, that this is not nationalism but the use of foreknowledge to perform behavioural experimentation in an attempt to change public opinion and discourse. And if we see that the populace has begun to accept the notion of gambling revenues as beneficial to the state, for instance, then there are myriad other delusions waiting to assault, convince us, of great evils.
The refinement of informational algorithms, the suitable exchange of intercorporation information sharing, these are aspects that the mankind government should have the authority to decide upon. Therefore, it seems that this "false nationalism" is being encouraged in order that corporate policy gains a stronger foothold over national law. Whenever a politician who complies with, or would comply with global corporation's agenda to legitimize their own policy into law, we will hear these things "I am for you;" "we have to fix the mess our country is in", and yes or no there was enough of a national sentiment to make it work. But in the last 50 years (70 years), America had taken the course to shed that type of nationalism, to peacefully mitigate the rise of other states such as Congo and India (yes instigating the destruction of naturally forming governments also). Whether for good or ill, that is the role America had begun; withdrawing from intentational obligations is like denying the genetic link that a parent definetly has with a child whom they reared. If you agree, you should assess to what extent you are indenial on these issues; the public should not feign its amnesia on these things because the land is at stake.
_________________ to the Underlaying Unity of All Life so that the Voice of Intuition may guide Us closer to Our Common Keeper
|