Larry,
With all due respect, you didn't read my last post or the one before it. Selective hearing, my friend. I clearly stated what my post WASN'T about, which is the Bible. I was originally using it as an example, and in contrast to the UB, since the UB contradicts the Bible on a multitude of issues, and how we validate the UB in comparison to the actual validity of the Bible.
Furthermore, I also stated that the fellow men and women here probably know the Bible significantly more than I do, which would confirm to them what I was saying about a story of the Bible I didn't know as well. Again, a misconception on your part by lack of intelligent reading. Moreso, I ALSO mentioned that only weakness in Faith will someone lash out in defense, rather than offer sound explanation. Jesus offered explanation on everything, and didn't bother using immature name calling (in reference to "dunce") to bid his work.
In addition, I don't remember saying "my book" in comparison to "your book" at any time on this forum. I have been completely and benevolently well mannered, although my critical analysis has offered intelligent reconsideration for what validity means. And if I'm under the correct impression of Mr Sadler, he wouldn't mind a mind like his own challenging his own first hand revelation for the sole sake of Truth in perfection. Because the way I see it is, if the UB is what it says it is, it won't mind being scrutinized for the sake of it's own authenticity. The Bible has taken more than enough for itself, and will continue to do so I'm sure, and the same goes for ANY book that claims such a status.
If you're happy and content with a decision regarding the UB, that's fine for you. For me, however, I see it through to the heart of the matter especially when it involves which way I choose to turn my ship of destiny, per se. As for the the many scientist, philosophers, etc..Anyone can be wrong, and no one is so high and mighty, no matter what their social status, that they couldn't be. Look at all the peoples of old...of anceint Rome? I bet they thought the same thing. So, that mentality is not a sufficient explanation, my friend.
Iris,
I use "we" to show respect, and not to show oppposition even when it defames my true character. From now on, I will be glad to be differentiate my manners from my bolder nature. In reference to this:
YOU clearly are not free yet; YOU are still a victim of your own fear. YOU are still living in fear of having someone else make up your mind for YOU
...you couldn't be more wrong. In fact, that would be the epitome of wrong. My beliefs are of the most far-reaching, tested, and tried beliefs in the world. In fact, my beliefs are the beliefs of the people who laid the foundations of your very psychological cornerstones of Faith. Solomon, Jesus of Nazereth, King Daivd, etc..and God forbid I say Bible. I don't take anyone's word for ANYTHING. I test my Faith, live it, and strive within and because of it everyday. If I come accross anything worthy of answering cosmic questions by revelation, then yes I am going to test it gauged by the sacredness of the Spirit of God, my Couselor.
Furthermore, I dont want you to make up my mind for me, I want you to explain to me your Faith! Is there a problem with that?..If I had a question for a Catholic priest, regardless of what it was, and even if it offered to him insult to his own religion, would he not answer it to the best of his knowledge? I know he would because I was already taken to that place in time. Nor would he use stone-throwing defensive measures to excommunicate me for asking them.
Lastly, I am not my own enemy. I don't have an enemy but the one who counter-produces my very nature by using falsity, trickery, and vice. There's nothing quixotical about that, that's just the way it is.
Vann,
For the sake of your knowledge of what the Church is really used for, pick up a book on communion. The whole purpose behind going to Church isn't to just sit there and listen to a sermon about someone else's attained wisdom over the years, because we all have this ability. The quintessential role of the Church, more than anything else, is to provide consecrated individuals that offer the sacrements of the Blood and Body of Christ, which Jesus clearly states we must do in "rememberence of Me". For what end?..To the end that through the blessed Body and Blood of Christ we will be filled with Spirit, in a much more personal form than how we experience it by reading a book...ANY book, including the Bible.
When receiving communion, you DO what Jesus told you to do. We can sit all day and wonder why we were told do this, or we can do it and experience it as I did, years ago, for the first time. I experienced the Spirit in a multitude of ways. My nature completely changed walking out of Church, all of which is not needed here.
In addition, I don't show up for Church once a week. I hardly go anymore, and I am responsible for this lack of will. I don't have to go once a week, I can go once a month, a year, or whatever. I go when I feel I need to go to reinfluence my soul with the Spirit, therefore strengthening it to defend myself against sin, which actually hurts the soul.
The biggest problem with the view of Church is that people just simply are too busy entertaining themselves with lesser, more mundane things. That's all. A hundred years ago Church was important because not only did people understand the need, they also didn't have the same dependent, earth bound distractions (counter-productive) we do dramatically today. But, think what you will. It seems odd to me that you would want to become an opposition to St Peter, given charge by Jesus, (Creator Son) Himself. But, no matter. Do as you will.
The bottom line here is, if you can't be confident enough to stand correctly by your paradigm, or be corrected by universal Truth if it ever calculated your first impressions wrong, why bother believing anything at all? I am 100% confident that what I believe is true, and if I come to find the UB is true, I will stand by it as I do my accumulated knowledge today.
lux, vita, amor
RS
_________________ The least initial deviation from the truth is multiplied later a thousandfold.
-- Aristotle (384-322 BC)
|