Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 5:29 am +0000 Posts: 6039
|
fanofVan wrote: The Urantia Papers certainly do present a clearly defined set of "parameters" or constraints for the repercussions of evil, sin, iniquity, and rebellion. There are two (as I understand the text): time and distance of effect.
Sin and evil effects are temporal and cannot survive time or penetrate eternity. Such effects are also constrained by geographic proximity, limiting the range of radial effects while those fade and diminish by time and the universe reality response to sin and evil/error.
So the effects of error and deliberate sin by freewill cannot persist or survive the freewill response of love, or truth, beauty, and goodness.
And here is where the UB contradicts the idea of freewill parameters and restraints. Every freewill experience and every freewill expression of love, or truth, beauty, and goodness is eternal in effect and has no boundaries of proximity effects. Those freewill choices are unconstrained. It is like osmosis (?)...a filter that allows some particles through but restrains the flow of others, which results in a concentration effect of the desirable particles. Crude analogy I know.
From a mortals perspective, temporal can be a difficult concept. Temporal effects can last a long time depending on the cause but cannot escape time nor resist the overwhelming love response of mercy ministry to the suffering experienced by the victims of the effects and repercussions of sin and evil.
According to the Papers, already there is over a thousand times more goodness from the response to the Satania rebellion than the suffering and repercussions of that freewill sin and evil.
More on the limits, constraints, and "parameters" of freewill in time and space:
118:6.5 (1300.1) Volition on any level short of the absolute encounters limitations which are constitutive in the very personality exercising the power of choice. Man cannot choose beyond the range of that which is choosable. He cannot, for instance, choose to be other than a human being except that he can elect to become more than a man; he can choose to embark upon the voyage of universe ascension, but this is because the human choice and the divine will happen to be coincident upon this point. And what a son desires and the Father wills will certainly come to pass.
118:6.6 (1300.2) In the mortal life, paths of differential conduct are continually opening and closing, and during the times when choice is possible the human personality is constantly deciding between these many courses of action. Temporal volition is linked to time, and it must await the passing of time to find opportunity for expression. Spiritual volition has begun to taste liberation from the fetters of time, having achieved partial escape from time sequence, and that is because spiritual volition is self-identifying with the will of God.
118:6.7 (1300.3) Volition, the act of choosing, must function within the universe frame which has actualized in response to higher and prior choosing. The entire range of human will is strictly finite-limited except in one particular: When man chooses to find God and to be like him, such a choice is superfinite; only eternity can disclose whether this choice is also superabsonite.
118:7.1 (1300.5) The function of Creator will and creature will, in the grand universe, operates within the limits, and in accordance with the possibilities, established by the Master Architects. This foreordination of these maximum limits does not, however, in the least abridge the sovereignty of creature will within these boundaries. Neither does ultimate foreknowledge—full allowance for all finite choice—constitute an abrogation of finite volition. A mature and farseeing human being might be able to forecast the decision of some younger associate most accurately, but this foreknowledge takes nothing away from the freedom and genuineness of the decision itself. The Gods have wisely limited the range of the action of immature will, but it is true will, nonetheless, within these defined limits.
118:7.2 (1300.6) Even the supreme correlation of all past, present, and future choice does not invalidate the authenticity of such choosings. It rather indicates the foreordained trend of the cosmos and suggests foreknowledge of those volitional beings who may, or may not, elect to become contributory parts of the experiential actualization of all reality.
118:7.3 (1300.7) Error in finite choosing is time bound and time limited. It can exist only in time and within the evolving presence of the Supreme Being. Such mistaken choosing is time possible and indicates (besides the incompleteness of the Supreme) that certain range of choice with which immature creatures must be endowed in order to enjoy universe progression by making freewill contact with reality.
118:7.4 (1301.1) Sin in time-conditioned space clearly proves the temporal liberty—even license—of the finite will. Sin depicts immaturity dazzled by the freedom of the relatively sovereign will of personality while failing to perceive the supreme obligations and duties of cosmic citizenship.
118:7.5 (1301.2) Iniquity in the finite domains reveals the transient reality of all God-unidentified selfhood.
_________________ "Live loyally today—grow—and tomorrow will attend to itself. The quickest way for a tadpole to become a frog is to live loyally each moment as a tadpole."
|
|