I'm just asking questions. I'm not making any insinuations.
Yes, they are both on the council of 24. That says a lot. It shows that mercy in our universe is certainly lavish (15:14.2).
Material Sons and Daughters apparently, like us, are not perfect and can make mistakes. But my question is this: Could Adam have not decided to take the same path as Eve? In other words, not knowing if it ever occurs somewhere in the universe that an Adam and Eve, due to some accident or other mishap ends up alone, was it a given that one or the other could not continue without their mate? Another way of putting it, was it God's will that Adam suffer the same plight as Eve? Could he have continued on alone? I mean there certainly are many of us humans who lose their mate and continue on. In that regard, if Adam had decided to continue without joining Eve in personal default, would things have been different? Was it possible for Adam to do that ? Would that have benefited their children? Would their children have been allowed to stay on planet? And would that have benefited us? as well as both of them in the long run of the eternal future?
I say all this in regard to what the papers say about what we can expect is something we will need to consider about how to handle life's sorrow and disappointment when we arrive on the mansion worlds.
Quote:
Paper 48 - The Morontia Life
48:6:36 (555.4) And from them you will learn to suffer less through sorrow and disappointment, first, by making fewer personal plans concerning other personalities, and then, by accepting your lot when you have faithfully performed your duty.
But one thing for sure is that I am very grateful to know, when looking at this situation with Adam and Eve that the extent of God's forgiveness regarding the making of mistakes is lavish. Instead of the other way around.
Quote:
Paper 28 - Ministering Spirits of the Superuniverses
28:6:5 (314.4) And then, in accordance with the findings of the Significance of Origins, a mercy credit is established for the survival of each rational creature, a credit of lavish proportions and one of sufficient grace to insure the survival of every soul who really desires divine citizenship.
And then there's this:
Quote:
Paper 76 - The Second Garden
76:5:7 (853.1) Misfortune has not, however, been the sole lot of Urantia; this planet has also been the most fortunate in the local universe of Nebadon. Urantians should count it all gain if the blunders of their ancestors and the mistakes of their early world rulers so plunged the planet into such a hopeless state of confusion, all the more confounded by evil and sin, that this very background of darkness should so appeal to Michael of Nebadon that he selected this world as the arena wherein to reveal the loving personality of the Father in heaven. It is not that Urantia needed a Creator Son to set its tangled affairs in order; it is rather that the evil and sin on Urantia afforded the Creator Son a more striking background against which to reveal the matchless love, mercy, and patience of the Paradise Father.
I guess what I would like to discuss is where is the line drawn between being in self-forgetful service to others (in the way Jesus was) and learning to make "fewer plans concerning other personalities"?