fanofVan wrote:
And I'm sure you know that Exxon Mobile did not prove global warming in the 80's and have not been developing Arctic drilling plans for 25 years based on their own internal engineering and scientific research (now in the public domain), which convinced EM of 3 things: start getting ready for the Arctic melt in the 90's, predict global warming before anyone else and immediately (1992) cease all internal studies and begin hiring bogus studies of false science paid to deny their own internal results, patterned on the tobacco industry successes doing the same - a model of calling a fact a lie and conspiracy (which 25 years later we now have toto and nod as evidence of their success!! - well done Exxon Mobil), and predict the end of the internal combustion/gasoline engine automobile by 2040 due to legislation and green energy technologies, in order to redirect their own business model....none of this in the interest of truth or science but in their own survivability and profitability.
This sounds like a great conspiracy theory.
fanofVan wrote:
Conspiracy theorists attract the narrow minded and the insane, as we see demonstrated so well.
Yes, this is true.
fanofVan wrote:
But why be burdened by facts? Or even the reality anyone can see and measure?
People see what they want to see and measure things where, when, and how they want. Or, you can take a nice picture.
fanofVan wrote:
Can a godly scientist write a godless science toto?...really?
Yes they can and they do it all of the time. It's called separation of Church and State, but only in their minds. Scientist are State sponsored and State paid. They call it Grants. Galileo started the trend, but he caved. He was not too fond of being the subject of a fondu.
fanofVan wrote:
Globalism is inevitable
Yes, but all in good time. Not by revolution or force at the business end of a weapon. And that weapon is a carbon tax. Read what TUB says about excessive taxation.
69:2.7 The first human foresight was directed toward the preservation of fire, water, and food. But primitive man was a natural-born gambler; he always wanted to get something for nothing, and all too often during these early times the success which accrued from patient practice was attributed to charms. Magic was slow to give way before foresight, self-denial, and industry.
We cannot have globalization when too many primitives are still around. They want to gamble with other peoples money.
fanofVan wrote:
And now I am told that carbon dioxide is not a greenhouse gas...but every plant and tree in the world knows it is exactly that!!
What is a greenhouse effect? I know that it is hotter in a greenhouse but it is enclosed in glass panes. Try building a greenhouse with a CO2 enclosure. This is the first lie and nobody questions it. The entire atmosphere blankets the Earth. All gasses have the same effect. But how convenient to pick a gas that has carbon. Why not pick oxygen or nitrogen? Plants know about nitrogen fixation and respire with oxygen and produce oxygen by releasing it from CO2.
fanofVan wrote:
Even Exxon Mobile considers it such and whether humanity "caused" global warming (which I doubt as well), EM is certainly convinced humanity is a major contributor to "greenhouse gasses" and the environmental effects.
Why would you believe Exxon Mobile when they are part of your conspiracy theory? And you will have to blame plants and trees for the majority of greenhouse gasses because their activity is responsible for much more of the biomass than man can ever do with expiration, flatulence and SUVs.
fanofVan wrote:
But to deny climate change and the effects that brings is lunacy of a whole new dimension. And to suggest that carbon emissions have no contribution is ignorance of an extraordinary scale of hubris.
It use to be global warming. Now its more conveniently called climate change. Climate change is otherwise known as weather. Nobody denies weather. And between ice ages there is global warming. So what?! I emit carbon in my breath and I do not deny this either. I have no clue as to what the contribution is or is not. But neither does anyone else and to suggest that climate scientists do know is ignorance of an extraordinary scale. What is for certain is that they want our money to conduct their studies on weather. They are paid by authoritarians that want to redistribute wealth by nefarious means. They do not believe in charity because they themselves are not charitable. They want something for nothing. They are the primitives of this world.
fanofVan wrote:
But, according to him...it's time we get busy! Who's not busy?
Some are busy doing the Father's business and other are busy thinking up ways to steal, cheat and lie about it all.
fanofVan wrote:
It's certainly an illuminating demonstration of what the UB describes as a short sighted and narrow minded time-unit perspective making today completely disassociated from the past and the future.
And if light is shining in your living room thank a chunk of coal and a coal miner. And although the "now" stands at the frontier of the past and the future, the future is uncertain. Science wants to make all sorts of predictions, from where a cannon ball will land, to the chance of rain tomorrow. They would also like to predict the roll of the dice or the numbers to the next Powerball. Scientists are the most prone to the temptation of making predictions because they are gamblers at heart. The problem is that they want state money to put down on the table. They do not believe in the "now" or the past, they are fixated on the future. That makes science prone to dogma. They must at least count on the taxpaying public on believing in them and their work. They revile competition and that is why they convene to oust any competitive thought.
Makalu wrote:
yes...if things had gone according to plan on this planet these moles wouldn't exist
And would it not be nice if we didn't exist? It appears as though you too revile alternative thought. You would rather wack it on the head, no?
Makalu wrote:
lmao sure they're being exposed in your fantasy reality espoused by those who politicize, spin, distort and ignore science to fit their agenda...falsehood masquerading as truth is evident and evil.
Science is funded by politicians and you are surprised that it amounts to PR, spin and distortions? I never make the mistake of ignoring science. I make myself well aware of those out use pseudoscience to bankroll agendas that are evident, untrue and evil.
nodAmanaV wrote:
Funny how some make claims about others but actually are just talking about themselves.
This is called Psychological Projection. This is a theory in psychology in which humans defend themselves against their own unconscious impulses or qualities by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others. It is also known as blame shifting.
Blame shifting is both primitive and childish. And this sort of activity is usurping the Creator, Who is the only One that can project His Image. Blame shifters project themselves. They do not reflect what God has projected.
Login
FAQ
Search
Members
